Threaded Mode | Linear Mode

Zxx · 12-22-2009, 06:03 PM

O, please. I thought it was real.

Reminds me of that critic who always said "it stinks"

I didn't know "Jap" was an insult!

The Hollow Earth pic is posted on http://www.ourhollowearth.com

So besides always just you saying it's fake It seems like you never give any other input.

Must be from all the paranormal research? Maybe a scared defense?

Browncoat · (This post was last modified: 12-22-2009 07:03 PM by Browncoat.)

Zxx...

I'm torn. Are you an honest to god nut job, or someone who doesn't believe in the paranormal and shows up to make a mockery of it?

I can't give you any other feedback other than debunking because you haven't given me anything other than absurd poorly faked junk. It's like you don't have a filter. You see things on the internet that the rest of us can't in all good faith take seriously and you post it like it's some sort of revolutionary break through.

Seriously, be a little more discriminating.

Do some real research. Find out who respected names are in the fields your looking up. On science related topics... look up actual science. Learn to distinguish between photoshop and real pictures. Rationalize. Use Occam's Razor.

I don't mean to be rude (truthfully, now I'm just being honest and disregarding any concept of rude or nice), but honestly do you wonder why you received so many negative rep points? Do you wonder why people tend to breeze past your posts in threads?

Now, I know I stand very good a chance of getting yelled at for this post. But, come on... we're talking about a field a lot of people don't take seriously as it is... we don't need to give them more ammo by giving them obviously fake evidence and theories we don't have any logical backing to.

We need to be able to explain our theories. We need to scrutinize evidence presented to us. We need to have reasons we believe what we believe (whether it's personal experience, or data done by a noted researcher, or the application of relevant data from another field) if we ever stand a chance of getting non believers to take us seriously.

If not... we're as good as the guy in the tin foil hat who thinks the CIA is stealing his thoughts.

::gets off his soap box and goes for a stiff drink::

Zxx · 12-22-2009, 07:18 PM

Well maybe even if the pictures are fake there's still a possibility and alot of real science to back it up or is questionable.

Alot of people don't believe in ghosts either!

Browncoat · 12-22-2009, 07:22 PM

(12-22-2009 07:18 PM)Zxx Wrote: Well maybe even if the pictures are fake there's still a possibility and alot of real science to back it up or is questionable.

Alot of people don't believe in ghosts either!

I never once said an antigravity car was outside the realm of possibility. But I don't present fake evidence to support it.

It's the fact that people don't believe in things that makes us have to work harder. Don't present evidence unless it's the best we have.

We have to be harder and more scrutinous of our evidence than anyone else will be.

Zxx · (This post was last modified: 12-22-2009 09:22 PM by Zxx.)

Actually I have a small design for an anti-gravity car that I've been pondering. As I was messing with building a hoverboard it seemed small. So I do have one built hoverboard deck of good design! I haven't put it together underneath to fly b/c I'm not sure or technically inclined but I know basic stuff etc. (you prob want pictures right? Maybe I can send it EM)

Any designed like a giant soapbox racer. (really strange design and I remember it good) Basically I'm guessing if I just put two hoverboard plates on the bottom it should hold enough weight.

So anyway I have TRUE(looking) schematics etc. You'll pro. say "fake". I was told that a few times by my dad but I don't think he'd know. He is an electrical engineer but he's past with the times. Anyway trying is the only thing that'll prove me wrong right! (you prob. want schematics pics to annihalate too? (I don't have photobucket) +I can't find all the exact parts for hoverboard, that must be why it's so impossible!

It's not about building it but controlling it. I am not good at that! It's VERY freestylish and the design puts off massive uncontrollable energy!

I am NOT good at doing any tricks! I am somewhat disabled. I can ride a bike and skateboard doing normal riding skiping, and small stuff but I'm not a freestylist tristster. I tried out for diving and I could not do a flip! I'm a cat. Anyway the design puts off *frequency signals* and I'm like a fish out of water! Can't keep up! You are supposedly supposed to create a clean fire but I see it impossible at times.

Actually the design now is not the first b/c the first was over freestylish! - New one is scaled back without it's temporal displacement wings!

Thomas Matthew · 01-20-2010, 05:28 PM

photoshopped.

clearly.

O'Cearnaig · 01-20-2010, 07:00 PM

I agree, totally fake.
BUT and it's a BIG BUT:
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/6.03/...ty_pr.html
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread17228/pg1

Things I've read over the years would indicate that we acheived 'anti-gravity' up to 60 years ago. I'm not saying I know anything but I have also heard of a model of a nuclear reactor at the old nuke museum at Sandia Labs. apparently it was about the size of a 5 gallon bucket. I know, Iknow the sheilding and cooling, but what if. And if a EM feild could be sustained around a craft...well, mabe we'd have something.

http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf33.html

You tell me.